Monsterliner
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to Gearhead Central. We are an automotive forum for all vehicles. We have areas for cars, trucks, semi trucks, motorcycles and recreational vehicles. It doesn't matter if you are just learning about cars or if your a die hard Gearhead, we have something for you. We have some new features to show you. Check out our showcase which is like a virtual garage. We also have competitions which is our contest software. You have to be a member to enter them but membership is free so sign up today.

Naturally aspirated or turbocharged

Discussion in 'General Automotive Talk' started by inmoe, Jan 8, 2013.

Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 4 users.
  1. inmoe

    inmoe New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Messages:
    15
    Which one do you think is better Naturally aspirated or turbocharged?
    Examples of a naturally aspirated car is a Renault Clio sport and turbocharged would be a ford fiesta st.
     
  2. tommymac

    tommymac Active Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2012
    Messages:
    265
    I'd go with naturally aspirated because it's cheaper to do and easier on the engine components.
     
  3. inmoe

    inmoe New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Messages:
    15
    That is definitely an interesting way of looking at it but come on, I would have to go for turbo noises over a high revving little car any day. But you are right about the price because if the turbo were to break or get damaged, I would have to fork out a lot of money just to get it fixed and a naturally aspirated car will never have such a problem.
     
  4. Flexin

    Flexin Admin Staff Member Founding Member Top Event

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,656
    Occupation:
    Truck Driver
    Location:
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    If your only talking small cars I think I would go turbo or supercharged as well. But a big torque V8 is always nice. I have always owned NA cars. Almost all were V6 so they had ok fuel mileage and nice power. I'm not against turbo cars, just haven't bought one yet.

    James
     
  5. Ryder13

    Ryder13 Active Member Founding Member Feburary Winner

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2012
    Messages:
    392
    Never had a turbo (but I did have an RX7 with a rotary engine). It - the Mazda RX7, was actually pretty cool but not that great on gas. Got it used and had it for about five years. But the question is turbo. Tempted but a buddy who is more knowledge mechanically than me am said turbo is great but if it goes wrong you are screwed. My hot car was a 280 ZX and 280s came in a turbo edition but I got a regular engine. Six, and fast enough for me.
    Ryder13
     
Verification:
Loading...
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page